I personaly do not like the book. To be honest, regardless of how much basing we did for Admission, I still like the book. Although the book is like a soap opera and predectable, it is interedting in showing the meaning of admission itself. It is also a book I can relate because it is not too long ago that I had to apply for admission. But for Wonder Boys, it gives me a weird feeling. Everytime I read the book, I feel like I get mad at Grady and James. I think James is extremely naïve. When he mentions that rich people are never happy. I just feel like it is such a naïve thing to say. I feel like he sounds like a kid who listen to their parents lecturing about life lessons. His relationship with Grady does not make sense to me. I find it odd that Grady is helping James and even taking him to his inlaw’s house for Passover. I do not know if grady is helping James by protecting him or hurting him. Aside from being naïve, I also found James to be an insecure youth who is lost in the world. The fact that he complains about Pittsburgh and says that he hates it there makes me think of myself. I remember complaining about Pittsburgh and the school. This just reminds me of how insecure I was and still am. I think the purpose of puttig James with Grady and their adventure together is to contrast certain aspect of Grady’s unbdeveloped emotion and self-knowledge. I do not think Grady knows much about what he wants or what he likes. He can easily ask Sara to give up the child, and he can also easily promise Sara to be with her. Yet, he then goes to Emily’s parent’s house for Passover. This shows that he still wants Emily to forgive him for his affair. Grady is stuck between Sara and Emily. He is unsure of whom to chose. I think he only wants something for an instant. Take the incident with Hannah Green for example, he wants to dance with her at the moment, but he is also debating on what to do to get Emily back. He wants Hannah for an instant and then goes back to wanting to save his marriage. He then gets distracted and forget about his problem with Emily. His unstable desire is also shown in his three marriages. So overall, I do not like Grady nor James. I think both are extremely insecure. This book is also confusing. I think there is so much problems that is happening at once and is extremely dramatic. However, I do have to admit that it makes a good movie.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Wonder Boys compared to the other books
I personally believe that this novel is somewhat interesting. On hand, it feels as if nothing productive has been described throughout the entirety of the novel. I feel as though something epic should happen due to its short time span. However, on the other hand, I also feel as if so many pointless events have happened. Yes, the death of a beloved dog is a big deal for those that knew him but I do not believe that it should be a main topic throughout the entire novel. I suppose that I just expected more out of the book due to the short.
I was happy to finally read about a character that was not held down by societal norms. Although I was constantly shocked that he was a college professor, I thought that it was interesting how he did not care about his responsibilities when engaging in illegal activities. He was constantly high, and yet he did not seem to care that his students or peers knew that he was doing such things. I am unsure of which character I can relate to the most. I feel like Amory was too tied down by society and what others thought, which forced him into following the rules. I cannot really relate to many of Portia’s actions, but I feel like I somewhat like Grady’s attitude toward societal rules. Although I am a rule follower like Amory, I like that Grady does what he wants to do, whether it is legal or not. I would never be able to do the things that he does, but I respect him for having the guts to do the things that Amory would only do due to emulation. Grady paves his own way and I think that that is one of his good qualities.
However, this being said, I am very happy that Sara looked past her feelings toward Grady and stuck to her thoughts. She did not immediately base her decisions off of emotion, which is a good quality to have. Many women are caught basing things off of emotion and not thinking about what is best for her, which is why I respect Sara. I personally think that, although she cheated on her husband, she handled the situation better than Portia did. I think that Michael Chabon portrayed her in a positive light, other than cheating on her spouse. The idea that he displayed the woman of the household as having a higher position than her husband speaks to the contemporary aspect of the book. This novel deals with many contemporary issues, such as smoking marijuana, in a way that was more enjoyable than Admission for me.
Paradox and Midnigh
Tripp seems to be a guy with some serious paradoxes of character. This seems to be reflected in the way that he describes things as well. He often uses paradoxical adjectives, or adjectives that don't seem to fit what he is describing. This happens a lot more when he is stoned than when he is not, which I guess could be a way to show us how his perception of things changes under the influence of weed.
The midnight disease seems to be a recurring theme in the book thus far, but what is it, exactly? It seems to be a blanket term that Tripp uses to refer to all of the terrible afflictions that writers seem to carry around. It reflects the depression, anxiety, and tendency for life to generally screw itself up when you most need everything to be OK. I wonder if the midnight disease is solely the affliction of writers, or even if writers become writers because of this ungainly burden. Hannah Green is a functional writer, and she does not seem to bear any marks of this depression, although her unexplainable attraction to Tripp can be seen as aversion of the disease I suppose. The stuff that Tripp carries around in his trunk, the dead dog, the tuba, the mangled body of the snake, are almost physical manifestations of the disease that he carries around all of the time. James Leer has this affliction in a pretty terrible way, especially indicated by his suicidal tendencies. He is a complex and layered character, and I don't think that we will ever really get to the bottom of his lies and stories and half truths. I started off the novel felling kind of sorry for him, but now I don't know enough about who he is to form a real opinion. Miss Sloviak is another character who tries to hide who she is, although her disguise is more physical and easier to see through.
too many details
Even though I liked the novel overall, it was sometimes hard to follow. There were too many crises occurring at once to mention them all here. The work seemed also “too busy,” like when a pattern has too many details to keep track of and takes away from it. Although each separate event by itself is well written and is meaningful to the reader, taken as a whole the novel wandered all over the place.
First you have the pregnancy. Sarah potentially giving birth to Tripp’s baby just seems so out of place. They have been having an affair of over five years and she just happens to find out that she is going to have a baby during the same weekend that Emily decides to leave Tripp. I feel that if he had been single and this occurred it would have been more understandable, but for it just to occur so out of the blue just seems unrealistic. Also, the fact that Tripp just does not seem to care enough about the consequences of Sarah’s pregnancy just was not believable for me. I understand that this lack of emotion may have to do with him always being high so it may not have really hit him yet.
Then you have James Leer. What a crazy kid! He fabricates his life so much that it keeps the reader constantly questioning what is the truth. As readers, we do not know whether to feel sorry for him or to dismiss him as crazy and move on and make peace with that fact. He is just so over-the-top that it is hard to believe that people like him really exist in the world. He has extensive knowledge of movie stars’ suicides and even goes as far to curve “Frank Capra” into his hand. I did not understand the deal with his grandparents/parents. Were they as bad as he claimed or was he just so physiologically disturbed that he needed to make up all those horrid details concerning them, especially regarding the supposed rape of his mother by his grandfather?
Even Miss Sloviak seemed out of place. I wrote my previous blog about how I generally liked this character and I really liked the scene in which Miss Sloviak changes in Tripp’s car. It was a simple scene but I found it almost sensual. But after finishing the novel, I do not quite sees where it fits in when considering the general scheme of the novel.
I feel that for me to fully appreciate the novel, I would need a very in-depth discussion on the novel. I would need to pull apart all the details to get the full picture.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Quirky and funny
Monday, March 1, 2010
Cigarettes and Chocolate...milk
Another example, although kind of an odd one, that seems to adhere to the habit/comfort theory, is Irene (Emily’s mom). “With one automatic hand she reached into a pocket of her smock, brought out a chick wrapped in flashing yellow foil, peeled it, and neatly severed its chocolate head” (174). And again when…. “She reached into her pocked withdrew another chocolate chick, unwrapped it, and cruelly bit off its head, once again returning the remainder uneaten to her pocket. She must have had a whole pile of mangled little bodies in there” (177). This time, though, the substance is not a drug. Yet, chocolate is known to release endorphins which provide a rush similar, maybe, to a drag on joint or a puff of a cigarette or a swig of whiskey. So maybe it’s about looking to substances to artificially (and more easily) provide an improved mood/feeling?
Like when Emily has to interact with Grady for the first time since she (in essence) said she was leaving him and she is sitting at the table next to him obviously very uncomfortable, Grady says she “looked like she was wishing for a cigarette” (211). In this case, it seems a little more like a desire for escape rather than comfort, but it could easily be a little of both.
At any rate, the book is full of people altering their states of mind (marijuana and alcohol) and indulging in more appropriate/acceptable substances (cigarettes and chocolate). Maybe another example of escape is how Tony sometimes dresses up as a transvestite while his brothers are very manly and have gun collections, etc. That might be stretching it, but I just can’t seem to decide what Chabon is saying about all this.
Don't Leer
No, literally, he’s a character. He has recreated himself in college. All of the other students and Grady think James is a poor, depressed kid whose mother died and whose father has cancer. He tells Hannah that he lives with his aunt in Mt.Lebanon. He writes these really disturbing stories that seem to be inspired by his own life, but I guess that’s just what he wants people to think.
He seems to be trying to turn himself into this tragic character—Grady catches him pondering killing himself.
He talks about this life, a life he says is his, and a life he wrote an autobiographical novel about.
But later we find out that James is a rich kid with country club parents who drive a Mercedes. Everything he told Grady and everybody else was fabricated.
I guess my question is why? Why did he want people to believe he lived in a dilapidated shack with a father dying from cancer? When most people fabricate a story about their lives they make their made up life better than their real one. But James took himself from the country club to the slums. Why?
I know he’s a writer, but I feel like his pathological lying has a deeper meaning than he just likes to make up stories. And he is a pathological liar. The part when he is lying to Grady about his parents after they come to get him is just pathetic. He lies about the gun being a fake, and he also lies about knowing how to roll a reefer. But these lies make no sense—what’s his motivation? Maybe he was truly unhappy in his actual life. Maybe he felt oppressed and unable to express himself.
I mean, apparently he’s an eccentric kid. He was able to give a list of actors who had killed themselves and their method of choice. He has a weird obsession with Hollywood. He stole a Marilyn Monroe jacket from the house of the chancellor of his college. He shot the chancellor’s dog with the gun he said was a fake. He wears a long stained trench coat that smells bad every day, and he carries his cloth knapsack with him everywhere.
Maybe he’s the classic case of the lost soul. He entered college and he’s just trying to find himself, but he’s confused and doesn’t know how to deal with the confusion. He seems to be really troubled, and he seems to be confused about his sexual orientation, which is made apparent by the things that go on between him and Crabtree. He also seems to be truly upset by the discouraging comments of his classmates about his stories. Plus there’s the whole he tried to kill himself thing (or at least thought about killing himself).
James Leer is a character all right; he’s the character in a book he wrote about the life he has been claiming as his own.
Who is James Leer?